(Originally posted for The Voice of Heard on
April 9, 2012)
I have read a few curious and interesting articles regarding autism in
the past week. The first, and most peculiar, article was one in my father’s
latest issue of Arkansas, a magazine exclusively for members of the
Arkansas Alumni Association. The short article discusses a support program
at the University of Arkansas, which is designed to help autistic college
students who have the cognitive abilities to succeed but require more help than
their neurotypical peers. More information on this program can be
found at the University’s website.
In other news, some experts at the American Psychiatric Association
have proposed that the definition of autism is “needed in order to dump
confusing labels and clarify that autism can involve a range of symptoms from
mild to severe.” There is concern expressed by some parents of mildly autistic
people regarding the proposed redefinition. They are afraid that their children
would be excluded from support programs and effectively diminish chances of
academic success and a normal life. But they are being assured that such a
scenario will not happen. The Telegram & Gazette article in
which this latest autism news story was reported can be found here.
And just today, I read a small article in this morning’s Telegram
& Gazette that reported a study, released online today in the
journal Pediatrics, linking autism to obese women. This is one
of the very first studies to list obesity as a contributing factor to the
development of autism alongside genetics. However, this latest theory may be
considered ludicrous to many non-obese mothers of autistic children. Until
more studies are done and the obesity-autism theory is either confirmed or
disproved, it is unclear how a mother’s obesity might affect the fetal
development of offspring. A more complete version of the article can be
found here.
Original Comments
David Abramson
May 11th, 2012 at 9:52 pm
Hey there. Checking out some different blogs about Autism and other disabilities. I likey! Mental diagnosis is an interesting issue, especially with Autism. Are you in favor of the re-definition?
Cheers,
David
Gabriel
June 16th, 2012 at 5:35 pm
It’s not the puzzle piece that’s the prleobm, it’s the word AUTISTIC I dislike.It removes a person’s individuality and makes assumptions about their learning, behaviour and socialibility.They are probably going to change my eldest son to Mild Mental Retardation once the psychometric testing is completed… or back to Speech/language delayed with global delays.But isn’t that what Autism is?? But this dx will deal with what he can do or could do in the future… not with what he can’t or shouldn’t be able to do.I have issues with the usage of labels… I keep getting asked… now why I am not fighting to keep the ASD label. If it makes assumptions about him… why should I… lets move forward.Personally, lets just ditch the labels all together and write a proper IEP… one that uses his strengths to go up, over and around his weaknesses turning them too into strengths.Sheri
No comments:
Post a Comment